Kao’s Board of Directors will conduct a substantial delegation of authority to the executive organizations, and further strengthen its monitoring function to encourage appropriate risk-taking by management and prompt and bold decision-making. In particular, the Board of Directors will effectively supervise the appropriate allocation of management resources, including human capital, and the adequate implementation of strategies by management. It also recognizes that it is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to develop internal controls and risk and crisis management systems, and will build and operate these systems appropriately.
At Board of Directors meetings (attended by Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members), Directors provide broad direction regarding business strategies and Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members deliberate on their appropriateness and the risks related to their realization and other matters in an objective and multidimensional fashion.
The Kao Group Mid-term Plan “K27” includes the vision of “Protecting future lives.” To accomplish this, the Company’s management is executing business in line with the Company’s strategies of (1) becoming an essential company in a sustainable world, (2) transforming to build robust business through investment, and (3) maximizing the power and potential of employees.
The Board of Directors considers it important for Inside and Outside Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members to complement each other with each of their knowledge, experience, and abilities, and to be able to demonstrate high effectiveness as a whole, in order to supervise that management is implementing business execution in a framework for transparent, fair, prompt and decisive decision-making accordance with the above strategies.
In addition to knowledge, experience and ability, the Company recognizes that diverse perspectives that come from diversity of the Board of Directors in terms of gender, nationality, race and age contribute to the promotion of business, global expansion and proper supervision and auditing, and promotes the appointment of such diverse personnel as Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The Company’s target for the ratio of women on the Board of Directors is 30% by 2025. The items of experience, knowledge, and expertise are reviewed annually by the Committee for the Examination of the Nominees for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members in terms of their importance to the Company’s sustainable growth. Based on the skills matrix, the committee deliberates on the composition of the Board of Directors and candidates for the upcoming fiscal year.
The Company aims for a small Board of Directors to accelerate decision-making while also considering the balance between having diverse personnel required to conduct the proper deliberations and supervision of execution. It has also set the number of Outside Directors to comprise at least half of the Board of Directors and is considering increasing it to the majority to ensure its diversity and influence and emphasizes their independence. In addition, the Company aims to have a majority of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members who meet the Standards for Independence.
As of March 21, 2025
| Attributes | Experience / Knowledge / Expertise | Main reasons for marking “✓” | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Term of office | Gender | Nationa -lity |
Manage -ment |
Global | Consu -mer goods industry |
Chemi -cal industry |
Branding | Human capital strategy |
R&D | Environ -ment/ society |
IT/DX | Legal/ risk manage -ment |
Finance/ account -ing |
|||
| Inside Directors | 9 years | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience in the Company’s Research and Development (including experience in global operations, and knowledge of fundamental and applied technologies and matter cycle research) (Doctor of Engineering) - Experience at the Company’s overseas business promotion projects - Experience as the Company’s Senior Vice President of Strategic Innovation Technology - Experience as the Company’s officer responsible for Human Capital Development |
||||
| 2 years | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience in the Company’s Chemical Business and management experience at overseas subsidiaries (Chemical Business) - Experience at the Company’s Procurement, Global (including promotion of sustainability activities in procurement) - Experience as the Company’s officer responsible for Accounting and Finance |
|||||||||
| 2 years | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience in the Company’s Consumer Products Business - Experience in management and global marketing at the Company’s overseas subsidiaries - MBA |
||||||||||
| - | Female | Australia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience leading business transformations and brand repositioning for a leading global sporting goods company - Experience advising on brand purpose, strategy, employee experience, ESG communications, and the impact of digitization - Chartered Accountant with big firm experience |
||||||
| Outside Directors | 7 years | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience as the top executive of a major global airline (including experience as Chairman of CSR and the Environmental Management Committee) |
||||||||
| 3 years | Female | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience as the head of a global division and the regional head of a major U.S. chemical company - Experience in overall human resources strategy, including compensation, development, and assignment in global businesses - Knowledge of sustainability |
||||||||
| 2 years | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience as the top executive of a major global food company (Mid-term ROIC management results) - Experience in restructuring overseas subsidiaries - Experience in the human resources department |
||||||||
| 1 year | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience as the top executive of a major global financial institution - Experience in international and corporate planning departments - Experience in risk management and legal affairs in bank management |
|||||||||
| - | Female | Canada | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience managing the Japanese Company of a major global restaurant chain - Experience as a head of various countries/regions, including Japan - Marketing experience in various countries and regions - MBA (Marketing/HR focus) |
|||||||
| Full-time Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 2 years | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience in the Company’s Product Quality Management - Experience at the Company’s global production sites - Experience in the Company’s process engineering development and plant management |
|||||||||
| - | Female | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Experience in the Consumer Products Business - Experience in overseeing Strategic Public Relations (including social contributions) and serving as Deputy Head of the Marketing Innovation Division - Experience as Executive Director of the Kao Foundation for Arts and Science |
||||||||||
| Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 7 years | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | - Attorney-at Law - Ph.D. in Law (Chuo University) - Professor at Keio University Law School |
||||||||||
| 1 year | Female | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | - Certified Public Accountant - Experience as a representative of a U.S. corporation - Experience as a partner of an IT venture company |
||||||||||
| - | Male | Japan | ✓ | ✓ | - Attorney-at Law, Japan and New York, U.S.A. | |||||||||||
(Scroll horizontal bar to view all items.)
| Experience/ knowledge/expertise |
Reasons for selection as experience/knowledge/expertise |
|---|---|
| Management | Experience as a top executive is necessary for effectively supervising management, their execution of the strategy, and for providing useful counsel to management. This experience is essential to ensure appropriate risktaking and prompt, decisive decision-making by the management to contribute to proactive governance. |
| Global | As part of our K27 strategy, we aim to expand globally and offer unique value to our customers that sets us apart, to avoid intense competition and price wars with competitors. Furthermore, we plan to accelerate global growth as part of K27, by transitioning to a localized production and consumption model focusing on local value, cost performance, and manufacturing. Importantly, understanding Japanese companies is critical and desirable for promoting global strategies, as our company is a Japanese firm with a majority of Kao’s revenues and assets being generated in the region. Experience with non-Japanese companies is also additive to help provide guidance and oversee global expansion efforts. Management positions and insights into overseas operations are also necessary to provide guidance and oversee these efforts. |
| Consumer goods industry Chemical industry |
Experience in and understanding of the consumer goods and chemical industries is imperative given Kao’s exposure to these sectors. To effectively oversee management's execution, it is important to take a comprehensive view of our business domains, including the consumer goods and chemical industries, from a higher-level perspective. For this reason, we believe that the Board should have a deep understanding of the business environment, market characteristics, and future outlook of these industries. |
| Branding | Actively investing in marketing of our core brands globally that are deemed capable of enhancing loyalty is an important strategy of Kao. It is also necessary for the Board to understand the elements of brand strategy so they can properly oversee the formulation and execution of brand and marketing initiatives as part of management strategies. |
| Human capital strategy | Developing human capital strategies aligned with management strategies is necessary for future growth, including strategically developing and acquiring talent. The Board needs to monitor the validity and progress of these strategies using specialized knowledge and experience. |
| R&D | Our company's research serves as the driving force behind the continuous creation of innovative and high-value products. We are committed to Essential Research and leverage the technological assets accumulated through such efforts to foster innovation. The Board must oversee whether our research framework sustains and develops innovation, effectively leverages the technology assets created, and contributes to expanding business and corporate value. |
| Environment/society | Since April 2019, the Company has adopted ESG strategies under the Kirei Lifestyle Plan. Integrating sustainability and management strategies is pivotal for achieving our purpose of “realizing a world in which all life lives in harmony.” and to achieve global growth. The Board is required to monitor the implementation of these strategies considering social trends and demands. |
| IT/digital transformation (DX) | Achieving the K27 target necessitates innovative initiatives leveraging IT and DX, such as creating new businesses beyond our existing frameworks, as well as digital marketing and digital communication. Experience, knowledge, and expertise in IT/DX amongst the Board are critical, while complementing the oversight by the Board of Directors by utilizing executives and external experts. |
| Legal/risk management | In the course of daily corporate activities, as well as in the creation of new businesses and business innovation, various risks are likely to arise. It is crucial to recognize and appropriately manage these risks, as well as to strategically, preemptively, and reactively address them while thoroughly understanding applicable laws, their background, and trends. The Board must possess experience, knowledge, and expertise in legal and risk management to ensure strategic and preventive responses to potential risks. |
| Finance/accounting | Ensuring the reliability of financial reporting, which influences investment decisions and strategic planning, and optimizing capital allocation from a company-wide perspective is crucial for sustainable value creation. The Board must possess experience, knowledge, and expertise in finance and accounting to drive growth, profitability and capital efficiency. |
◎ Indicates Chairman of the Board or specified committee. ○ Indicates attending member.
| Name | Age (as of March 21, 2025) |
Board of Directors |
Audit & Supervisory Board |
Committee for the Examination of Nominees for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members |
Compensation Advisory Committee for Directors and Executive Officers |
Compensation Advisory Committee for Audit & Supervisory Board Members |
Attendance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board of Directors |
Audit & Supervisory Board |
||||||||
| Directors | 64 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 14/14 | ー | |||
| 65 | 〇 | 14/14 | ー | ||||||
| 63 | 〇 | 14/14 | ー | ||||||
| 52 | 〇 | ー*1 | ー | ||||||
|
Outside/
Independent |
72 | ◎ | 〇 | ◎ | 〇 | 14/14 | ー | ||
|
Outside/
Independent |
64 | 〇 | ◎ | 〇 | 14/14 | ー | |||
|
Outside/
Independent |
65 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 14/14 | ー | |||
|
Outside/
Independent |
66 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 11/11*2 | ー | |||
|
Outside/
Independent |
59 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | ー*1 | ー | |||
| Board Members Audit & Supervisory |
65 | 〇 | ◎ | 14/14 | 10/10 | ||||
| 59 | 〇 | 〇 | ー*1 | ー | |||||
|
Outside/
Independent |
61 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | 14/14 | 10/10 | ||
|
Outside/
Independent |
61 | 〇 | 〇 | ◎ | 11/11*2 | 10/10 | |||
|
Outside/
Independent |
60 | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | ー*1 | ー | |||
In FY2025, the Board of Directors, in accordance with the Board of Directors’ approach, focused its deliberations on the following points.
Kao’s Board of Directors will conduct a substantial delegation of authority to the executive organizations, and further strengthen its monitoring function to encourage appropriate risk-taking by management and prompt and bold decision-making. In particular, the Board will effectively supervise the appropriate allocation of management resources, including human capital and the adequate implementation of strategies by management. It also recognizes that it is the responsibility of the Board to develop internal controls and risk and crisis management systems, and will build and operate these systems appropriately.
Through regular reporting on business-specific ROIC, the Board of Directors engages in discussions on business profitability from a medium- to long-term perspective. Ongoing discussions are held regarding challenged businesses and priority themes, with results being achieved particularly in the cosmetics business. In the overseas Global Consumer Care Business, efforts will continue to strengthen brands and develop markets in major overseas markets, focusing on cosmetics business and skin protection business, while also advancing reforms in challenge areas. In addition, the progress of “K27” is regularly monitored to increase the certainty of achieving its targets.
Reports were provided on the results of the employee engagement survey, and discussions were held on future responses based on those results. The Board of Directors has also continued to deliberate on the progress and outcomes following the introduction of the OKR (Objectives and Key Results) human capital activation system, which encourages employee challenges, as well as the internal job posting system. It was confirmed that diverse challenges across the Group are increasing and expanding, and that further collaboration through dialogue is being promoted. In addition, reports were provided by the executive side on the framework for the selection and development of next-generation senior management, and the Board of Directors confirmed its progress.
It was confirmed that the internal control system has been properly developed and is being operated. Discussions were also held on initiatives to further strengthen the system in support of global growth.
Off-site meetings were held to further deepen discussions at Board of Directors meetings. Participants freely exchanged views on the current status and future direction of the overseas Global Consumer Care business, including businesses facing challenges, as well as on human capital development strategies and corporate branding strategies.
In addition to the above, directors who concurrently serve as executive officer report on execution and executive officers in charge report on matters deliberated by the Management Board.
With an eye to enhancing its corporate value in a sustainable manner, we aims to improve the functions of the Board of Directors by evaluating and analyzing the effectiveness of the Board as a whole, including through a self-assessment by each Director, and a disclosure with a summary of the results.
Since FY2015, evaluations have been conducted once a year based on a survey of all Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members and discussions by the Board of Directors. In FY2024 the Company introduced interviews with some Directors and an effectiveness evaluation of the Board by an external third party (scheduled once every three years) to continually enhance the depth and objectivity of the evaluation. In FY2025, the Company conducted peer reviews (mutual evaluations) of Directors to confirm that each Director is fulfilling their expected role. The Committee for Examination of Nominees for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members (the “Committee for Examination of Nominees”) and the Compensation Advisory Committee for Directors and Executive Officers (the “Compensation Advisory Committee”) were evaluated at the same time.
Based on the survey responses, the Board of Directors verified, discussed, and evaluated the results, and confirmed the direction of future initiatives to address the issues that were identified.
The Board of Directors’ effectiveness score (single-choice) was 4.5 points (out of 5 points; 4: Mostly adequate, 5: Adequate), which was in line with last year’s assessment. Responses to the open-ended questions also indicated that the Board’s effectiveness is functioning adequately. Efforts were made to address the issues identified in the previous effectiveness evaluation (board diversity, ESG discussions, dialogue with shareholders, etc.), and progress was observed, with the scores for those areas improving. Opinions were also expressed regarding areas where there is room for further improvement, and recognition of issues and the direction of future initiatives were discussed and shared at Board of Directors meetings.
Both Outside Directors and Inside Directors demonstrated the expertise expected of them (as listed in the skills matrix) and were found to be fulfilling their expected roles. In particular, Outside Directors were mutually evaluated on whether they exercised oversight, provided advice, and reflected stakeholders’ views, and it was confirmed that they were fulfilling those roles.
From the numerous opinions raised, the main ones are summarized below.
In order to disclose the status of ongoing improvements based on effectiveness evaluations, the issues raised in the previous evaluation, the results of improvement initiatives, and the most recent evaluation have been summarized as follows. The Board of Directors, the Committee for Examination of Nominees, and the Compensation Advisory Committee for the current fiscal year will continue to address the issues raised in the most recent evaluation.
| FY2024 Evaluation and issues | FY2025 Initiatives | Most Recent Evaluation and Future Initiatives | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composition | Steady progress was made regarding the diversity of the Board of Directors. Continuous discussions are needed based on the future vision of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
| Discussions and monitoring function |
|
|
|
| Operation |
|
|
|
| Dialogue with shareholders |
|
|
|
| FY2024 Evaluation and issues | FY2025 Initiatives | Most Recent Evaluation and Future Initiatives | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discussions and operation |
|
|
|