Risk Management Activities

Initiatives for main risk

After deliberation by the Risk and Crisis Management Committee and the Management Board, Kao has selected the 14 particularly significant risks as the main risks that could have a negative impact on its sustained profitable growth and contribution to the sustainability of the world. We also review these main risks at least once every six months based on changes in the business environment.
The division in charge formulates countermeasures for main risks and manages its progress. Details of main risks are disclosed in the Annual Securities Report*1 .

Initiatives for corporate risk

We conducted a risk survey for Genba from the on-site operations perspective, interviews with management from the management perspective and analysis of the external environment to identify and assess the major risks and action issues that could hinder the achievement of the Mid-term Plan (K27). Among main risks, we have defined “corporate risks” as the risks that would have a major impact on management and require an enhanced response. Once a year, the Risk and Crisis Management Committee conducts a review based on its analyses of an internal survey and the external environment as well as interviews with management, and the Management Board decides upon risk themes and risk owners (Executive Officers). Each owner establishes a countermeasure team to propose countermeasures, monitor risks and respond when risks materialize.
The Risk and Crisis Management Committee deliberates on the effectiveness of countermeasures and manages its progress, and the Management Board reviews themes every year. In its reviews, we also consider new corporate risks and make changes to the content of our priority efforts, and continuously strengthen our responses. For corporate risks that have been addressed to a certain level of success, they are shifted to a day-to-day management system by the department in charge.

This shows the corporate risks initiative process conducted in three stages throughout the year. From January to August, we conduct risk survey and external environment analysis, and from September to October, we conduct interviews with  management to assess important risks and issues to be addressed. From November to December, we examine and determine corporate risks themes based on annual report.

“Risk surveys”
We conduct risk surveys of divisions and subsidiaries in Japan, as well as subsidiaries in Asia, Europe and the US, regarding risks that may impede the achievement of the Mid-Term Plan (K27), and identifies important risks and issues to address them from the perspective of the on-site operations. The number of risks that come up in risk surveys is in the hundreds. We analyze and assess these risks, addressing those that can be managed at the operational level through on-site responses. For risks that require a company-wide approach, such as cross-organizational risks, we strengthen our responses in collaboration with the relevant departments.

“Analysis of the external environment”
We continuously analyze risks that are rapidly changing, complex, and diverse, such as the international situation, the business environment, and social issues, in collaboration with internal and external experts. We also conduct analysis with reference to reports on risks from think tanks around the world.

“Interviews with executives”
Based on “risk surveys” and “analysis of the external environment”, we conduct interviews with members of the Management Board and others to deepen discussions on important risks for the Kao Group from a management perspective and risks that we should strengthen our response to. By discussing risks and issues identified in the field with management priorities and strategic perspectives, we reconcile the risk perceptions of the on-site operations and management.

In this way, “On-site operations” and “management” work together to promote ERM.

Main themes and its actions regarding corporate risks

Theme Details of risks Response
Large-scale earthquakes and other natural disasters and BCP response
  • Risk of harm to employees, damage to facilities, the supply chain, and difficulties in supplying products to markets resulting from large-scale earthquakes or other natural disasters such as large typhoons and floods brought on by climate change.
  • Enhancing hardware and software measures based on flood risk studies at each site, and providing disaster prevention education to protect employees and their families.
  • Formulating BCP for long-term suspension of operations in Japan and strengthening BCPs at sites outside Japan.
Risk of cyberattacks
  • Risk of temporary suspensions or delayed of business activities due to cyberattacks targeting Kao group or business partners, and subcontractors etc.
  • Risk of unauthorized acquisition or leakage of confidential information and personal information.
  • Establishment of Group-wide regulations and promotion systems, and promotion of awareness-raising activities.
  • Strengthening measures such as access control and monitoring, and developing backup and recovery plans for isolated environments.
  • Strengthen the security of the entire supply chain by confirming the status of measures taken by suppliers and manufacturing contractors, etc., and requesting improvements as necessary.
  • Strengthening incident response capabilities based on BCP (including recovery drills for receiving orders and shipments) and purchasing cyber insurance.
Human Resource Securing
  • Risks that affect the execution of business strategies due to the inability to promote the acquisition and development of human resources with high level of expertise required in each field and human resources who will become leaders.
  • Strategic recruitment activities to enhance social competitiveness
  • Career development to increase engagement
  • Allocation of human resources according to global and departmental issues
Geopolitics
  • Risk of human casualties, temporary suspensions of operations due to supply chain disruptions, or changes in consumer purchasing due to the destabilization of political and social conditions, diplomatic tensions, conflicts or other reasons.
  • Developing risk scenarios and response systems, and monitoring political and social situations.
  • Establishment of guidelines for ensuring employee safety.
  • Strengthening the supply chain networks for raw material procurement, etc.
Reputation Risk
  • Risk of deteriorating brand value and social credibility due to the spread of negative reputations and misunderstandings about information dissemination and marketing activities through social media, etc.
  • Risks that brand value and social credibility will decline due to inadequate response to such risks and reputational risks arising from such risks when risks inherent in business activities materialize.
  • Establishment of a pre-check system for advertising and information dissemination
  • Continuous implementation of internal training
  • Early identification of risks through monitoring of social media and other means.
  • Timely and appropriate disclosure of accurate information and the Kao Group’s approach and response stance when risks materialize.
Pandemic response
  • Risk that the pandemic will disrupt the delivery of products and services
  • Risk of shrinking cosmetics market, etc., due to changes in purchasing behavior
  • The risk that the pandemic will affect the stable operation of business activities due to the impact of the pandemic on employee health management and employment continuity
  • Revise the guidelines and formulate action plans for each country, and review stockpiles, etc. based on the experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Establishment of a system to ensure the safety of employees and maintain business continuity
Product quality issues
  • Risk of serious product quality issues arising that would result in loss of social credibility.
  • Strengthen internal awareness-raising to prevent serious product quality issues from arising.
  • Strengthen company-wide responses in the event of serious damage arising due to product quality issues.

Early response to emerging risks

We define “emerging risks” as risks where information or knowledge necessary for decision-making is lacking, and risks that could significantly impact management in the future.
To identify and address such emerging risks at an early stage, we conduct an annual review of emerging risks every year.

It is essential to strengthen risk intelligence*4 in order to identify and respond to emerging risks at an early stage. In order to strengthen risk intelligence, we are collaborating with a various external experts to enhance risk insight (the ability to read signs of change without relying solely on experience). Additionally, we are enhancing scenario planning, which involves considering responses to potential uncertain future situations.

  • * 4 Ability to quickly detect signs of risk, analyze impacts, and respond

This shows Kao collaborates with a variety of outside experts. In order to strengthen risk intelligence, we enhance risk insight collaborating with experts, relevant ministries, NGOs, etc. for each of the various risks surrounding the company.

In addition, in response to corporate risks such as Large-scale earthquakes/natural disasters, and geopolitical risks, we implement Business Continuity Management (BCM) based on actual emergency responses. We also strengthen scenario planning through simulations and drills that assume long-term supply chain outages aiming to strengthen more concrete preparations and swift responses.

This shows the strengthening of responses to corporate risks such as “Major earthquakes, natural disasters, and BCP responses,” and “Geopolitical risks.” The left shows continuous improvement through the PDCA cycle, in which the BCP is reviewed after drills and training, improvement/examination. The right shows the strengthening of scenario planning planned for each fiscal year on themes such as “Nankai Trough earthquake”, and “Geopolitics.” By linking PDCA cycle on BCM with scenario planning, it represents an effort to strengthen preparedness for and response to emerging risks.

Emerging Risks in Focus

Risk related to Regulatory Uncertainty in Responsible Raw Material Procurement

Kao procures natural resource–based materials, including palm-derived raw materials and pulp and paper, on a global basis through multi-tiered supply chains. In recent years, alongside increasing expectations regarding human rights and environmental considerations, the regulatory and institutional landscape surrounding raw material procurement has been rapidly evolving.

Regulations and requirements related to raw material procurement are being introduced and revised in different forms across countries and regions, and their scope, interpretation, and practical implementation continue to evolve. As a result, it is increasingly difficult for companies to determine in advance the full set of standards and requirements with which they must comply, creating uncertainty in assessing compliance and prioritizing responses. In addition, regulatory updates may increase procurement complexity and costs and impose constraints on supply chains, potentially affecting overall business operations.

Kao recognizes the increasing volatility and uncertainty of the regulatory environment as an emerging risk and is advancing the following key initiatives:

  • Advancing responsible raw material procurement (including supplier selection and traceability) as a foundational approach
    *For more information, please see “Responsibly Sourced Raw Materials.
  • Monitoring global regulatory developments and strengthening monitoring frameworks
  • Enhancing cross-regional coordination to improve information sharing and ensure consistent responses
  • Developing flexible procurement and operational strategies under regulatory uncertainty

Risk Related to Cyberattacks on Factory Production Facilities and on Business Partners, Contractors, or Other Third Parties

In recent years, cyberattacks leveraging AI and other technologies have become increasingly diverse and sophisticated, with ransomware incidents causing prolonged business disruptions being reported. As supply chains grow more complex, attacks routed through overseas sites and third parties with insufficient security measures are increasing, creating structural risks that cannot be fully mitigated by individual companies alone. In addition, the digitalization and external connectivity of operational technology (OT) environments at manufacturing and logistics sites have introduced new attack vectors.

Cyberattacks causing operational shutdowns at factories or system failures at third parties may disrupt product supply and business activities, potentially having a significant impact on business continuity and performance. In addition to implementing defense-in-depth measures, Kao emphasizes rapid restoration of business operations in the event of a cyber incident and strengthens cyber resilience to prepare for potential intrusions.

Kao recognizes this risk as an emerging risk and is advancing the following key initiatives:

  • Strengthening the security of control-system networks (OT environments), including establishing monitoring systems at manufacturing and logistics sites and addressing risks associated with external connectivity
  • Strengthening supply chain security capabilities, including improving security environments at overseas sites and conducting thorough assessments and follow-up of business partners
  • Strengthening resilience through measures to prevent the alteration of backup data and through recovery drills

We address response to cyberattack risk as a corporate risk.

Geopolitics

Geopolitical risks have remained high in Europe and East Asia, where we conduct businesses. In addition, such risks may increase in countries and regions where we procure raw materials.

If destabilization of political and social conditions, diplomatic tensions, or other reasons cause a deterioration in the environment surrounding our business, human casualties, a temporary suspension of operations due to supply chain disruptions, or changes in consumer purchasing behavior, our targets for net sales and profit may be unattainable.

From these situations, we recognize geopolitics as an emerging risk that could have a significant impact on future operations. And we prepare risk scenarios for countries and regions with heightened geopolitical risks, provide systems for response where needed, and monitor the political and social situations. In addition, we have established guidelines for ensuring employee safety and are working to strengthen its supply chain networks. We address geopolitics as a corporate risk.

Risk Related to the Transformation of Digital Communication Driven by Generative AI

The rapid expansion of generative AI and AI-powered search is creating a significant shift in digital communication between consumers and companies and brands. Kao has long worked to deepen consumer understanding of its products and services, enhance consumer experience, and co-create value through its websites, social media, and other channels. These efforts serve as the foundation for delivering value created through Yoki-Monozukuri.

As AI-powered interfaces become primary points of information access, consumer decision-making processes are evolving. In this environment, if Kao’s information and brand value are not appropriately recognized and referenced by AI systems, there is a risk that accurate information may not reach consumers, that brand value may not be fully conveyed, or that it may be interpreted in unintended ways, potentially affecting business value. In addition, risks related to data privacy, transparency, and the reliability of AI-generated content (including deepfakes) remain.

At the same time, this transformation presents opportunities to enhance competitive advantage. By structuring its accumulated information assets—including scientific knowledge, product technologies, quality and safety data, consumer insights, customer interactions, and brand content—into formats that are accessible and understandable for both consumers and AI systems, Kao aims to establish a source of differentiation.

Kao recognizes this risk as an emerging risk and is advancing the following key initiatives:

  • Establishing a cross-functional global structure
  • Strengthening information infrastructure to enhance AI discoverability and optimize the use of generative AI
  • Expanding distinctive and valuable content for consumers
  • Developing common guidelines and governance frameworks

In an AI-driven environment, Kao will continue to build brands that are consistently chosen by consumers, based on reliable information assets and deep understanding of consumers.

Page Top