After deliberation by the Risk and Crisis Management Committee and the Management Board, Kao has selected the 14 particularly significant risks as the main risks that could have a negative impact on its sustained profitable growth and contribution to the sustainability of the world. We also review these main risks at least once every six months based on changes in the business environment.
The division in charge formulates countermeasures for main risks and manages its progress. Details of main risks are disclosed in the Annual Securities Report*1 .
We conducted a risk survey for Genba from the on-site operations perspective, interviews with management from the management perspective and analysis of the external environment to identify and assess the major risks and action issues that could hinder the achievement of the Mid-term Plan (K27). Among main risks, we have defined “corporate risks” as the risks that would have a major impact on management and require an enhanced response. Once a year, the Risk and Crisis Management Committee conducts a review based on its analyses of an internal survey and the external environment as well as interviews with management, and the Management Board decides upon risk themes and risk owners (Executive Officers). Each owner establishes a countermeasure team to propose countermeasures, monitor risks and respond when risks materialize.
The Risk and Crisis Management Committee deliberates on the effectiveness of countermeasures and manages its progress, and the Management Board reviews themes every year. In its reviews, we also consider new corporate risks and make changes to the content of our priority efforts, and continuously strengthen our responses. For corporate risks that have been addressed to a certain level of success, they are shifted to a day-to-day management system by the department in charge.

“Risk surveys”
We conduct risk surveys of divisions and subsidiaries in Japan, as well as subsidiaries in Asia, Europe and the US, regarding risks that may impede the achievement of the Mid-Term Plan (K27), and identifies important risks and issues to address them from the perspective of the on-site operations. The number of risks that come up in risk surveys is in the hundreds. We analyze and assess these risks, addressing those that can be managed at the operational level through on-site responses. For risks that require a company-wide approach, such as cross-organizational risks, we strengthen our responses in collaboration with the relevant departments.
“Analysis of the external environment”
We continuously analyze risks that are rapidly changing, complex, and diverse, such as the international situation, the business environment, and social issues, in collaboration with internal and external experts. We also conduct analysis with reference to reports on risks from think tanks around the world.
“Interviews with executives”
Based on “risk surveys” and “analysis of the external environment”, we conduct interviews with members of the Management Board and others to deepen discussions on important risks for the Kao Group from a management perspective and risks that we should strengthen our response to. By discussing risks and issues identified in the field with management priorities and strategic perspectives, we reconcile the risk perceptions of the on-site operations and management.
In this way, “On-site operations” and “management” work together to promote ERM.
| Theme | Details of risks | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Large-scale earthquakes and other natural disasters and BCP response |
|
|
| Risk of cyberattacks |
|
|
| Human Resource Securing |
|
|
| Geopolitics |
|
|
| Reputation Risk |
|
|
| Pandemic response |
|
|
| Product quality issues |
|
|
We define “emerging risks” as risks where information or knowledge necessary for decision-making is lacking, and risks that could significantly impact management in the future.
To identify and address such emerging risks at an early stage, we conduct an annual review of emerging risks every year.
It is essential to strengthen risk intelligence*4 in order to identify and respond to emerging risks at an early stage. In order to strengthen risk intelligence, we are collaborating with a various external experts to enhance risk insight (the ability to read signs of change without relying solely on experience). Additionally, we are enhancing scenario planning, which involves considering responses to potential uncertain future situations.

In addition, in response to corporate risks such as Large-scale earthquakes/natural disasters, and geopolitical risks, we implement Business Continuity Management (BCM) based on actual emergency responses. We also strengthen scenario planning through simulations and drills that assume long-term supply chain outages aiming to strengthen more concrete preparations and swift responses.

Kao procures natural resource–based materials, including palm-derived raw materials and pulp and paper, on a global basis through multi-tiered supply chains. In recent years, alongside increasing expectations regarding human rights and environmental considerations, the regulatory and institutional landscape surrounding raw material procurement has been rapidly evolving.
Regulations and requirements related to raw material procurement are being introduced and revised in different forms across countries and regions, and their scope, interpretation, and practical implementation continue to evolve. As a result, it is increasingly difficult for companies to determine in advance the full set of standards and requirements with which they must comply, creating uncertainty in assessing compliance and prioritizing responses. In addition, regulatory updates may increase procurement complexity and costs and impose constraints on supply chains, potentially affecting overall business operations.
Kao recognizes the increasing volatility and uncertainty of the regulatory environment as an emerging risk and is advancing the following key initiatives:
In recent years, cyberattacks leveraging AI and other technologies have become increasingly diverse and sophisticated, with ransomware incidents causing prolonged business disruptions being reported. As supply chains grow more complex, attacks routed through overseas sites and third parties with insufficient security measures are increasing, creating structural risks that cannot be fully mitigated by individual companies alone. In addition, the digitalization and external connectivity of operational technology (OT) environments at manufacturing and logistics sites have introduced new attack vectors.
Cyberattacks causing operational shutdowns at factories or system failures at third parties may disrupt product supply and business activities, potentially having a significant impact on business continuity and performance. In addition to implementing defense-in-depth measures, Kao emphasizes rapid restoration of business operations in the event of a cyber incident and strengthens cyber resilience to prepare for potential intrusions.
Kao recognizes this risk as an emerging risk and is advancing the following key initiatives:
We address response to cyberattack risk as a corporate risk.
Geopolitical risks have remained high in Europe and East Asia, where we conduct businesses. In addition, such risks may increase in countries and regions where we procure raw materials.
If destabilization of political and social conditions, diplomatic tensions, or other reasons cause a deterioration in the environment surrounding our business, human casualties, a temporary suspension of operations due to supply chain disruptions, or changes in consumer purchasing behavior, our targets for net sales and profit may be unattainable.
From these situations, we recognize geopolitics as an emerging risk that could have a significant impact on future operations. And we prepare risk scenarios for countries and regions with heightened geopolitical risks, provide systems for response where needed, and monitor the political and social situations. In addition, we have established guidelines for ensuring employee safety and are working to strengthen its supply chain networks. We address geopolitics as a corporate risk.
The rapid expansion of generative AI and AI-powered search is creating a significant shift in digital communication between consumers and companies and brands. Kao has long worked to deepen consumer understanding of its products and services, enhance consumer experience, and co-create value through its websites, social media, and other channels. These efforts serve as the foundation for delivering value created through Yoki-Monozukuri.
As AI-powered interfaces become primary points of information access, consumer decision-making processes are evolving. In this environment, if Kao’s information and brand value are not appropriately recognized and referenced by AI systems, there is a risk that accurate information may not reach consumers, that brand value may not be fully conveyed, or that it may be interpreted in unintended ways, potentially affecting business value. In addition, risks related to data privacy, transparency, and the reliability of AI-generated content (including deepfakes) remain.
At the same time, this transformation presents opportunities to enhance competitive advantage. By structuring its accumulated information assets—including scientific knowledge, product technologies, quality and safety data, consumer insights, customer interactions, and brand content—into formats that are accessible and understandable for both consumers and AI systems, Kao aims to establish a source of differentiation.
Kao recognizes this risk as an emerging risk and is advancing the following key initiatives:
In an AI-driven environment, Kao will continue to build brands that are consistently chosen by consumers, based on reliable information assets and deep understanding of consumers.